Business law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 14

Business law - Essay ExampleIn Saudi Arabia, supreme spiritual councils order how Islamic law should be applied and have authority over legislation. On the otherwise hand, the IUS law is derived from, statutory law, common law, mash rules, administrative law, and constitutional law. Statutes provide enactments of legislative bodies of the US and atomic number 18 more specific in dealing with issues than the constitution. Common law, sometimes called case law provides laws or decisions by courts in personal cases.The US court system consists of judicial branches of the state and federal governments charged with the meter reading and application of the law. The system is divided into two administrative split systems, the state and the federal, each acting as independent of the legislative and executive branch. It is a dual court system inherited from the colonial period. In comparison, the court system of Saudi Arabia or the Sharia court system includes the basic judiciary of the earth and its lawyers and judges make up the ulema, which is the countrys religious leadership. Besides, there are extra-sharia state tribunals that detention conflicts related to particular royal decrees. The final entreaty from both the government tribunals and sharia courts is to the king. All tribunals and courts amount sharia rules of procedure and evidence. However, this system has been criticized for being arcane, slow, and lack of some protection of justice and of being uneffective of dealing with world issues. The court system in Saudi Arabia has no jury trials and their courts consider a couple of(prenominal) formalities.In the United States, a right to appeal is guaranteed by the statute or an underlying intelligent or constitutional principle. An appellate court must listen to the appeal. The appeal by permission or leave needs the appellant to get a leave to appeal. In situations like this, the appellate court and the lower court may refuse or grant the appellants command to appeal the decision of the